• Wove in the ends and sewed on the buttons yesterday morning for the January Aran.  I like this cardy — it has a comfortable Wisconsin-ness to it, good for a fine winter afternoon puttering in the garden, or a rainy day curled up with a good book.

    Aran1

    For some reason, my right slants are much tidier than my left slants (I’ve noticed this with decreases, too — note to self, fix this!).  But it smooths out pretty well with blocking.  I really like the three-dimensional effect that comes with Aran patterns.

    Fishtrap_detail

    Here are some suggestions for future January Aran knitters —

    Allow some extra "seam allowance" stitches where you want the cuts to be, maybe one or two.  This is not mentioned specifically but sort of implied, when Elizabeth says to sew down the turning, but it is much further along after the section about designing one’s own fishtrap/cable layout, so I had quite forgotten that I had read it a week earlier.  Worth remembering, if only for those nervous about cutting their knitting.  It would also have helped me avoid that section of the armholes where the cable seems to completely disappear along the outside edge, where it blends into the reverse-stockinette of the sleeve; I should have added an extra line of that lovely single-twist to make it stand out, as I did at the edge of the button band.  I would also suggest, especially if you want to use Sheepswool, that you consider putting 2 stitches between cables; I used 1, and although it can be blocked hard enough to show both clearly, 2 might be better.

    Aran_flat_1

    When you are sewing the reinforcing lines before cutting, make sure that the top stitch on either side of the cut-to-be is securely sewn down.  The cutting makes this particular stitch especially vulnerable, and even more so if you’ve left the top row live for picking up a collar.  If you’ve made a line of "seam allowance" stitches, then you can sew between this last stitch and the others, back and forth for a few machine-stitches to hold it down.

    I had a really hard time with the formula Elizabeth gives for figuring the buttonhole spacing.  She says, "Count the stitches of one front, subtract 6, divide the remainder by 6, and subtract 3 from the result.  The number left will be the number of stitches between each of the seven 3-stitch buttonholes, with 3 extra stitches at the bottom."  This never worked for me — she seems to be saying that a buttonhole will take up 3 stitches, whereas as given it covers 5 (it makes a hole 3 stitches wide).  Possibly instead of "*knit the number of stitches you have calculated, make another buttonhole, and repeat from *," she meant that you should end up with x stitches between the buttonholes, counting the last K2tog of the buttonhole’s edge — I don’t know.  My own formula ended up being more like (t – nb) / s = x, where t is the total number of stitches in the buttonhole band, n is the number of buttonholes needed, b is the number of stitches needed to work the buttonhole (5, in this case), and s is the number of spaces between the buttonholes, including the half-spaces at the bottom and top.  Considering that I was never very good at algebra, this was pretty brave of me, I thought.  I still ended up doing this, though —

    Buttonholeband

    to fit in that pesky remainder, using the pins to mark the buttonholes-to-be.

    The Sheepswool has a pleasant roughness to it, and it softens considerably with wet-blocking.  Dry, it has an appealing lanolin smell, although in the water it smelled distinctly daggy.  I had not a single knot, and only a few thin spots here and there — I barely broke in to the seventh skein (needed it only for the last cast-off), so six might do someone else, but seven should be enough to make this size cardigan with a bottom band.  I rather like the jackety look of it without that bottom band, so I’ve left it off.  I was rather intrigued by the deerhorn buttons on the website, and Meg herself (!) advised me to ask that the wool and buttons be matched in color, so maybe my batch of wool is a bit browner than might be expected from "pale gray".

    Button_detail_1_1

    Aran2

    "Arans are now your oyster; enjoy them"!  "The rest of the designs in this book will now seem childishly simple, and will, I hope, have the appeal of a child — a nice child; not too pretty, not too prissy, but with good genes and reasonable upbringing"….

  • Booking Through Thursday wants to know what we think about multi-volume novels — "I’m thinking here of any story that is split into more than one volume, stories such as Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings, Rowling’s Harry Potter volumes, Eddings’ Belgariad, to name just a few. Christie’s Hercule Poirot stories do not count, nor do Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes stories, as the reader can consume them in any order."

    1. Do you enjoy reading multi-volume stories? I’ve read a number of these series, sagas some of them, including all that BTT mentions above.  I’m not sure that Harry Potter belongs in this category, as each book is fairly self-contained — perhaps that series can be regarded as a crossover.  The same goes for Diana Gabaldon’s "Outlander" series, and Patrick O’Brian’s Aubrey/Maturin novels.  It’s certainly easier to follow what’s going on if you’ve read the earlier books, but it isn’t completely necessary, as I think it is with Tolkien, Jordan, et al.
    2. Do you prefer the shorter stories that are done in two or three volumes, or do you willingly go for longer tales? It certainly does depend on the author and story — I got bored with Stephen R. Donaldson’s "Thomas Covenant" series pretty early on, and stopped reading Robert Jordan’s "Wheel of Time" series around book 8 or 9, from sheer exhaustion, I suspect.  I enjoyed most of the Eddings books, although I think he’s been losing steam lately.  I really enjoyed Robin Hobb’s "Liveship" trilogy, although I’ve not read any other of her books.  And I’ve just found out that the long-awaited fourth installment of George R.R. Martin’s "Song of Ice and Fire" is finally out, but it’s been so long since book 3 (five years!) that I might just wait until the series is complete, then reread from the beginning….
    3. What do you like/dislike about these long tales?  It seems that the time and emotional/intellectual investment required creates a kind of bond with a series, like with a personal relationship, although on a different scale, of course.  You feel let down by a series that disappoints, but rewarded by one that involves you deeply.  It can be hard to let go of characters that you’ve come to love, when the series ends.
  • Here is Cinxia, which I finished and wore to the theatre in early December, when we took the girls to a Christmas matinee.

    Cinxia_1

    I should perhaps have made it with a bit more ease, as it tends to slip back off my shoulders, and possibly a bit longer, but I like it anyways (I was aiming at a size M, 42 inches for my 39 bust, so would recommend a little more ease than one might think for a bit of embonpoint, and now upon subsequent wearings I suspect I might rework it slightly larger).  For my first determined resizing attempt, though, this was wildly successful — everything is in proportion, and it looks pretty much exactly like the picture!  As I said earlier, I used this formula in the resizing.  I think that the bias of the fabric (from the twisting of the knit stitches) makes it pull in a different direction from what one would expect — this is what makes the bottom front slant downwards so attractively.  The neck shaping does tend to make it contract a bit across the back of the shoulders, I suspect, which is why mine slips — I might rework it a bit, which is why I’ve neglected writing about it for almost two months, but I am too tempted by other things at the moment.

    Cinxia_detail

    This is an interesting design — I like the sort of hint-of-the-Fifties about it, and love the wide collar/scoop neck combination.  The shaping is different from what I’ve done before, so it was fun to try something new, too. 

    The Shetland Aran seems to have a bit more drape than the Classic Elite Renaissance of the original, but it is very nice to knit with and to wear (it softens up remarkably with washing), and I love the color —

    Cinxia

    I was hoping to get better pictures with the self-timer, but it is so windy outside that they were all blurry!  I feel a little negligent about not writing this up, though, so here it is.  Maybe I can get a better one in a few days….

  • Bunny_sweater

    Grandma made this for Laura a few years ago, and Julia is wearing it now.  I had one just like it when I was little, and it was a big favorite.

  • I finished the second sleeve of the Aran cardigan last night, so there was no more putting it off — time to cut.

    Cardy1   

    It’s really very simple — run a line of basting down the center of the place to be cut, then run two lines of very short stitches along each side of the basting, then cut along the basting itself.  If the line to be cut stops in the middle of the knitted piece, as for an armhole, run a horizontal line of reinforcement stitches just below.  (This ends up looking similar to a zipper’s stitching.)

    Cardy2

    Here are the basting and stitching lines of the neck front, ready to cut.  It was a lot easier to sew and cut on the reverse side, since in my particular Aran that was where the knit stitches (the wrong side of the purl stitches) made lovely guide lines for me.

    Neck

    The "kangaroo pouch" does fall into place quite nicely, just as Elizabeth says.  I didn’t think of it until it was too late, but the technique would also make perfect armhole gussets, thereby reducing some of the bulk at the underarm — six or eight stitches would probably do, but you’d have to take it into account when laying out the Aran patterns beforehand (e.g. if you want the cables to run up the sides of the armholes).  Elizabeth didn’t suggest it, but I added a few extra purl stitches for a kind of seam allowance — sacrificial purls, really.  I estimated about where I thought the armholes would start, and an inch or so below that I added another stitch for this purpose, although as it turned out I underestimated and had to cut considerably further than I’d expected.

    Cardy3

    Sewing down the body was tricky, as the flexibility of the knitting and the fact that it was still a tube made it hard to hang on to, kind of like giving a ten-month-old toddler a bath.  Each line gets easier, though, as the one before holds things in place.

    Cardy4

    If the thought of this makes you queasy, look away now.  It’s kind of horrible and fascinating at the same time.

    Cardy5

    Cardy6

    Neck2

    It is nice and tidy, and I can see where it would make a great deal of difference in Norwegian sweaters and such, where working multicolored patterns flat can be a real chore (especially with more than two colors), but I must say that I’m not entirely convinced that this is the solution for me, or for every project.  (Haven’t tried knitted steeks yet, of course.)  I’m not wild about the stiffness of the machine-stitching compared to the knitting — it is similar to the feel of a ribbon sewn onto the back of the front band of a cardigan.  But I’m glad I’ve tried it, after all — now, on to the button band!

  • Blackbird‘s Middle Child requests "a good hat" for Show and Tell Friday.  I do not have a hat head, much as I desire this mysterious thing.  I do have lots of old photos, though….

    Audrey_hat

    This is a cousin from a few generations back, obviously very close to her uncle, who was my great-grandfather, as Audrey sent him many photos at various stages of her life.  She and Arthur were married around 1912, and so this may be a wedding or honeymoon photo, but she always seems well-turned-out, so I can’t really say.  He’s no slouch in the dapperness department, either, although I might wish that his own hat was just a little bit bigger.

    (And here, Middle, you get two hats for the price of one!)

  • Booking Through Thursday writes, "We’re just wrapping up the third week of January. Wow. Already. Time to check in with your reading report" —

    1. Have you finished any books yet? Aaugh, progress reports already??  Why, yes … yes I have!
    2. If you have, how many, what were they, how did you like them?  Dozens!  Here’s a few — Alice the Fairy and A Bad Case of Stripes, both by David Shannon (as usual, mixed feelings about David Shannon, Stripes is mildly amusing, I don’t like Alice, girls love them both); Marjorie Priceman’s How to Make an Apple Pie and See the World, Mary Jane and Herm Auch’s The Princess and the Pizza, Lynley Dodd’s Hairy Maclary from Donaldson’s Dairy, Edward Ardizzone’s Ship’s Cook Ginger, all old favorites; Uncle Jed’s Barber Shop, which Julia chose at the library (an unusual choice, I thought, for a 3 1/2-year-old, but certainly there is always time for lessons in tolerance, generosity, and persistence, and this is a good one); and the girls’ current obsession, Fancy Nancy by Jane O’Connor and Robin Preiss Glasser.
    3. If not, why not? Are you currently reading anything that you just haven’t finished yet? Er, don’t look at my sidebar….
  • Temptation

    Cth_spanishmoss

    "You came, I was alone, I should have known, / You were temptation! / Your smile luring me on, my heart was gone, / You were temptation!"

    (With apologies to Arthur Freed and Nacio Herb Brown, who in all probability were not thinking of Cherry Tree Hill’s Supersock merino in Spanish Moss when they wrote this song….)

  • 2765_small

    "Still Life With Aran Sleeve and French Horn"
    The Bluestocking (fl. late 20th-c.-early 21st-c.)
    mixed-media (wool, bamboo, brass, etc.), temporary installation (since demolished)

    (We went to the local children’s museum this afternoon.  "Museum" is a rather loose description here, but still it makes me come over all arty-farty sometimes.)

  • Am finishing up the body of the Aran cardy, and starting on the first sleeve.  I wondered whether I should block the pieces before basting and cutting them, but can find no advice for or against this in the Almanac — I’m guessing that it’s not terribly important, or Elizabeth would have mentioned it.  It seems to me that the stitches would lie flatter if I block it first, which might make a difference in where the machine-basting ends up, but on the other hand, the garter stitch edging is to be picked up afterwards, and it might be awkward to work a new bit onto a blocked bit.  I’m leaning towards not blocking, simply because the gauge didn’t change all that much with it, so it shouldn’t matter terribly.  If anyone thinks I’m making a dreadful mistake, please let me know!

    I think this is what Elizabeth means by the "kangaroo-pouch neck-shaping" — the instructions seem a bit casual.  "About 3" shy of desired body-length," she writes, "put the center 1/3 of the front stitches on a piece of wool, cast on 2 stitches [I put one on each side of the departed stitches], and continue working.  When the body is finished … machine-stitch and cut the front center 3", which will fall apart to reveal a nicely scooped-out neck."

    Kanganeck

    Frankly, this looks more like a codpiece to me, but I suppose that a) I’ve been watching too much of "The Black Adder," and b) "kangaroo pouch" is more tactful.

    I’m also doing short-rows and a three-needle bind-off at the shoulders, instead of a stepped slant on the back half and sewn shoulder seams.  I think the three-needle bind-off is wonderfully tidy, and more flexible than my sewing.

    Aransleeve1

    David and I went out for lunch and a movie yesterday, while Grandma was here to look after the girls.  We tried a new Indian restaurant, and then went to see "The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe".

    Pevensiesenternarnia_narniaweb_small

    I wasn’t really sure what to expect, having heard different reactions from friends and in print.  I was very disappointed in the first few seconds, in which we see the Blitz from the viewpoint of the German bombers — distracting and unnecessary — but the non-Lewis addition of the evacuation scenes were so moving that I was in tears.  (What an awful position to find oneself in, sending one’s children away in order to keep them safe, or being sent away to live with strangers, in an already-disorienting time.)  I thought it interesting that Edmund was the one who ran back from the Anderson to get the photograph of their father, not one of the others, who we could expect to be more sentimental.

    I did not think that Tilda Swinton was particularly miscast (as I’ve heard from a certain person who may disagree at length here, if she likes!).  Swinton always gives me the creeps anyway.  I thought that her plastered dreadlocks were odd, but not out of character, as it were, although I found myself more distracted by her dress and its strange way of seeming that it contained her, rather than that she wore it.  I could find, in my dash through the book last night, no mention that the White Witch is supposed to be dark-haired — the only physical characteristic mentioned other than a general ominousness is her crimson lips — and that mental image seems to be from the Baynes illustrations that so many of us grew up with (reinforced by Jadis’ "later" appearance in The Magician’s Nephew, published after LWW but set earlier in Narnia’s history).  I never found the Baynes illustrations of the White Witch to be particularly frightening, anyway, so it doesn’t bother me.

    A lot of the dialogue has been changed from the book, for reasons that on first viewing don’t seem particularly obvious to me, other than to inject more humor into things (Mr. Beaver’s first line, for instance).  Lewis’ dialogue always seemed to me very easy, very readable and speakable and natural, so it seems strange that it’s been rewritten, but I can’t really quibble much, never having written a movie.  (Mr. Beaver’s first line was pretty funny, after all.)  I do think it unfortunate that it was felt necessary to "update" some of the wartime speech, especially when it was so painstakingly established to be that particular time and place.  (It certainly doesn’t hurt to use a different vocabulary now and then, or "dude" will soon be the only word people know.)

    The effects in this movie are amazing — the animals are so incredible that after a few moments I stopped being intrigued by the effect and just accepted that beavers and lions could talk.  There were a few rear-projection inconsistencies that were jarring — the backdrop when the children cross the frozen river, for one — but otherwise it’s just incredible.  The expressions on Aslan’s face are so subtle, so nuanced — I would say "so human" if that weren’t more than a little insulting!  I liked that the filmmakers didn’t make the animals more Beatrix-Potterish, like putting an apron on Mrs. Beaver or such (Tumnus’ scarf was all right, as I worried that he was cold!), and I appreciated the way that the Beavers played off each other (an inspired bit of voice casting, there).  I liked the little touches, too, such as the giants — which in Lewis are rather stupid — pushing each other and arguing on the way to the battle, and the way that the lamppost actually appears to be growing from the ground, with a treelike lumpiness of surface roots at the base, which we later, in The Magician’s Nephew, find to be the case.

    In fact, one of the few distractions I had during the movie — aside from the cell phone ringing somewhere in the theatre during the Stone Table scene, for heaven’s sake — was thinking suddenly, "Is Susan’s cloak … knitted?"

    Susanatthebattle_narniaweb_cropped

    This is not the best image of the cloak — the first time she’s wearing it, it looks like a fairly fine-gauge stockinette.  Curious — an interesting choice, if it is.  A knitted cloak would not be particularly comfortable in the rain, but it would be warm otherwise and it certainly moves very nicely.

    A lot has been said, in a number of places, about Susan, and quite rightly a lot of feminists are disappointed that it’s the girl who grows away from Narnia when she gets interested in boys and make-up.  Susan always struck me as being a bit wet, so it didn’t surprise me that, in The Last Battle, she as "the pretty one" and the oldest girl of the family is the one who falls prey to the desire to fit in with what is obviously meant to appear to us as superficial.  I’m not saying that in any given set of people, one of them has to lose the childlike innocence that lets one believe in magic wardrobes, but it does happen in real life.  This is, after all, a story, and Susan’s function in the story is as an example of what might happen to those who want only to "grow up" and fit in with everyone else.  (Paul R. Ford makes an interesting point about Lewis’ own character, which was in fact much more like Susan’s than Lucy’s, something Lewis himself realized and acknowledged.)  While my sympathies were usually with Lucy, I could almost always identify with Susan’s practicality (the coats, the meals) and often with her fears.  Lucy is, of course, the one who is afraid but follows Aslan anyway, the point that Lewis wants to make.  Lewis wasn’t the only writer, by any means, to succumb like Susan to the stereotypes of his time and place — it can’t be argued that men didn’t have the upper hand in pre-war England — and while I don’t think that women have to be satisfied that "at least" he gave the most important role to a female character, Lucy, it seems that in at least this he was willing to be fairly open-minded.

    For some reason that I don’t understand, I hesitate to say that this movie is "brilliant" — my head is still swimming with the stunning images and the cultural implications, its problems and joys, the deep feelings I’ve had for these books ever since I first read them at age eleven or twelve.  All in all, I found myself much more viscerally involved in this movie than in any of the three "Lord of the Rings" movies.  (I knew what was going to happen, but that didn’t stop me from gasping aloud when Edmund was wounded at the battle, and finding this inexpressibly moving.)  I don’t know if this is due to the movies themselves or to the stories — I think of myself as being more than a little hobbitlike, but perhaps it is that I could never find myself in Middle Earth, but as Professor Kirke might point out it is not impossible that I too might, like Lucy, one day find a door into Narnia.