• Amberwell

    The knitting has got rather left behind lately, I'm afraid — have been reading quite a number of things lately of all shapes and sizes, as
    it were — finished most, tossed some aside with or without regret.

    — Not, in fact, Amberwell, but Young Mrs Savage because it is one of my favorites (I have an ex-library copy, watched the librarian weed it from the fiction shelves and was torn between saying "oh, no, you can't get rid of any of these, she's wonderful!" and thinking "well, I'll have that, thank-you-very-much!", and I confess that greed won out).  I joined the D.E. Stevenson list on Yahoo a few months ago, but haven't yet de-lurked, not sure why.  They are reading at a terrific clip and discussing as they go, and although I started The House of the Deer with the best of intentions have v. quickly fallen so far behind that I cannot possibly catch up on this go-around.

    — A truly terrible biography of Roald Amundsen by Tor Bomann-Larsen, which takes the prize as one of the worst books I have ever read.  I should say partly read, as I literally could not finish it, even though I had paid $3.50 good money to ILL it, and felt on that score alone I should get my money's worth.  I suppose I could have accepted either the shoddy writing or the snark, but not both at the same time.  How depressing, to read a biographer who so obviously despises his subject.

    — Penelope Fitzgerald's Offshore, wh. was quirky-interesting, but I think I liked The Gate of Angels a bit better.

    — Major Pettigrew's Last Stand, wh. I could not help referring to inadvertently as "Major Pettigrew Saves the Day" (and in fact did so again as I typed this).  Thought it started off extremely well, and I had very high hopes, but thought that it descended rather unnecessarily into farce towards the end, although I would still recommend it as a charming and well-written story.

    — La's Orchestra Saves the World.  Loved it.  Have read so far only Smith's Isabel Dalhousie series, but appreciated them immensely, their quiet intelligence and satisfying if not necessarily "happy" endings, and so too with this one.

    — Am finding myself now and then wishing wistfully that there were more Joanna Trollope novels yet to be read.  I've especially appreciated The Men and the Girls, The Spanish Lover, and The Rector's Wife, but have enjoyed all of her modern books.  (Am not feeling especially historical lately, so I haven't yet delved into her alter ego, as it were.)

    — A new biography of Jane Grey, wh. I had to turn back in to the library as I'd had it for six weeks and got only about two chapters along.  How someone can make the Tudors so dull, I don't know.  Got at the same time a history of the Vikings that I do hope to finish in the next few days, although I must say it's rather difficult to keep track of who is who — there's Harald Fairhair, Rolf the Ganger, Sven Forkbeard, Ingvald the Lame, Torgeir the Gormless, Sven the Eccentric (no, I made that one up), and even with the epithets I can hardly tell them apart.

    — Came home from the library this evening with an old Rosamund Pilcher, and William Trevor's Love and Summer from the new book shelf.  Not ready any of his before ….

  • Eyjafjallajökull

    Because we all want to know —

  • What cracks me up the most is that this is just the first medieval farthing quiz!

  • Cookies_08

    It's Girl Scout cookie time!  If you don't manage to come across a booth sale at your local grocery store, search for your county name and "girl scout cookies" — every council is different, but that's a good start.

    Our troop had our first booth sale last night, and pretty much sold out of what I thought was a fairly generous stock.  And we have three more sales scheduled!  So I'm off to get more Thin Mints, for sure.

    I woke up early this morning with the rain, and decided to take a stab — metaphorically speaking, of course — at a crochet flower which I'm going to use to identify my tote bag from the fourteen other ones at our meetings.  The pattern is a fairly simple one from Simmy at Echoes of a Dream.  I am obviously still very new at crochet! but after a few initial puzzled frowns, I got the hang of this one — and you can probably see that I felt more sure of myself on the last row of petals, in the back.

    4830_small

    Obviously, sock yarn wasn't the ideal choice for this particular use — thicker yarn would be best for a luggage identification — but it'll do in a pinch.  I might turn this one into a barrette later.  Hmmm…

  • Since I'm obviously on a roll with long-abandoned projects, I picked up this one yesterday —

    Honeycomb 

    Honeycomb from Knitty, in Elsebeth Lavold Silky Wool.  I printed the pattern on March 26 … 2008.  Got to the top of the ribbing, did the first row of the pattern stitch and paused, uncertain about the honeycomb itself, and there it has remained for nearly two years.  Tch.

    Remembering the very first row of cabling essentially every stitch one at a time, I thought yesterday, "well, that will never do," and dug out the instructions for left and right twists.  Much easier. 

    So instead of C2B, do the RT: K2tog but do not remove sts from needle, K first st again and slip both sts off needle together.  And instead of C2F, do LT: K second st tbl but do not remove it from needle, K first st and slip both sts off needle together.  Easy peasy.

    I'm still not wildly enthusiastic about the honeycomb stitch, but it goes quickly, with just K2, P2 rows on the wrong side and mostly K rows on the right, and every now and then what, without even thinking about it, I started calling the twizzle row.

    Davis&white
    Not twizzles, but I like this couple, Meryl Davis and Charlie White of Michigan, in the free dance Sunday evening.

  • I suspect that wearing this scarf a few times will probably offset most of the annoyances I've had with it.

    It is of course Vintage Velvet from Scarf Style.  To begin with, the famous Muench Touch Me chenille is strangely not that pleasant to knit with.  It is extraordinarily soft, but after a while the hard core of the yarn feels stiff and unyielding.  I got so weary of it that I let it sit for — well, I hate to say it, but at least a year at a stretch, I think.

    Vintagevelvet1

    Vintagevelvet2

    I also found it very difficult to actually see what I was doing, although that may also have been due to the dark color and the fact that towards the end I was watching men's short-track speed skating much of the time.

    Article-0-08486B06000005DC-949_468x308

    Here is Lee Jung-Su, Sung Si-Bak, and Lee Ho-Suk of South Korea ahead of Americans Apolo Ohno and J.R. Celski and Canadian Olivier Jean (photo from the Daily Mail) in the 1500m finals, in Vancouver on February 13.  That was an exciting race!

    But the scarf was beautifully soft once worked up, and Laura and Julia were both enchanted with it.

    So then the other day I tossed the scarf into the washing machine — had heard from a number of sources how nerve-wracking the process was, and so I was actually rather blasé about it.

    Vintagevelvet3

    The scarf was quite stiff coming out of the washing machine — like a piece of felted wool.  I hurriedly chucked it into the dryer and left it there perhaps 15 minutes or so, which relaxed it a bit, but it still felt oddly hard when I laid it out to dry. 

    Laura came across it and wailed "It's not soft any more!"

     Vintagevelvet4 

    It did soften up considerably in the day or two it took to dry, although the cable up the center took a surprisingly long time to stop feeling like a length of nylon rope.

    A number of ends worked their way out, and a couple of middles in
    places, worming here and there despite not doing so at all as I was
    knitting.

    Vintagevelvet5

    With five skeins it was just 60 in. before felting — much too short, I thought — and even shorter than that afterwards.  By dint of hard stretching, I did get it to 64 in. along the edge.  I was relieved to see, though, that the wonderful architectural point at the ends was still there. 

    It is very nicely soft now, though, and I had to take it forcibly away from Laura this evening, or she would have worn it to bed.  It still feels a bit short to me, although I suppose it's really more a
    decorative accessory than functional, and its decorativeness is
    undeniable!

  • Three_rib_hat_1
     
    I did not make the Knitting Olympics this year, but am rather wishing there was an event for Finishing, as I've somehow managed to wrap up two long-neglected projects in two days — the Vintage Velvet Scarf (still drying) and this one, the Three-Rib Beret, from an article by Jacqueline Fee in the November/December 2009 "Piecework" magazine.

    The moment I saw this darling hat, I thought of some Jaeger Matchmaker DK I've had in the drawer for quite a number of years — this is shade 656 Cherry, not that it matters any more, I suppose, because it's been discontinued, curse them.  A terrific yarn.

    I had to enlarge the pattern, as it was far too small as written for Julia's impressive noggin.  I cast on with 102 sts, increasing to 204 for the st st section, dec to 180 and then 90 for the K5, P5 section, and down again to 36 for the K2, P2 top; I did each section 2 rounds longer than in the pattern, to keep the balance more like the original.  Julia says it's a bit small, but okay — but I'm not concerned by her coolness, as she hasn't taken the thing off since I sewed on the last pompom last night.

    Had to use 2 skeins, but got to try out the Russian join which worked pretty well.

    Three_rib_hat_2

    It doesn't look like much flat, but on a head it is incredibly cute, and with pompoms almost irresistable!

  • Vest_fiance_1

    Ta-da! at last, the Vest for a Fiancé, from Knitting With a Smile by Inger Fredholm of FredholmKnitting.  I started this nearly a year ago,
    let it sit over the summer when it was just too hot, and then picked up again
    in a rush hoping it would be done by Christmas or so.  I did get the
    knitting itself done in early December, but lost heart at the finishing, then gave myself a talking-to last week and dug it out again.

    Vest_fiance_2

    I want to love this book — I want to love this pattern.  I like it
    a lot, but I'm annoyed at some little things about it that kept me from
    loving it with quite the abandon I wanted to.  Be warned straight off
    that this pattern at least assumes a considerable amount of experience — which
    in all fairness she warns about ahead of time — but there is little
    information about finishing and nothing at all about steeking.

    The style is very colloquial, which I think may make it a little
    difficult for those knitters extending themselves with a pattern a
    little harder than they are used to. There are a few little typos in
    the Vest for a Fiancé at least — a cast-on and 7 back-and-forth rows gets you to the
    RS, do the picot at the hem and armholes K2tog, yo but around the front edges P2tog, yo (well, I assumed that
    was a typo, and did it K2tog, yo). 

    Vest_fiance_3

    Vest_fiance_4

    I centered both the front and back patterns, as it bothered me that they weren't already. Luckily, the patterns themselves were so pleasing to my eye even at the time that this was only a minor cavil.

    (The color in the top photos is more accurate than in the bottom ones.  The sunlight was rather tenuous; perhaps that was it.  My camera seems to get a little over-excited when it has to do reds, too.)

    Vest_fiance_5

    I also added a row of the white "fleur de lis" across the shoulder and back of the
    neck, as in the photo of the original vest, not the one knitted for the
    book — I just thought it looked more finished that way.

    I think that the front edge band is a bit too big.  I thought so from
    the moment I cast it off, but sewed it up anyways because I was, well,
    I can't say heartily sick of the thing, but I just really wanted it to be
    finished.  It didn't look too big after some energetic blocking,, but I think it probably could be worked smaller.

    As I said, there are no instructions as to steeking and finishing, so of course I poked around on the internet beforehand, starting with Eunny's justly-famous Steeking Chronicles. 
    She was (at least at the time) quite set against machine-sewed steeks,
    and argued so logically that I was reluctant to do them that way.  I
    had, though, already bought the Smart wool, which is superwash, and
    Eunny noted (somewhere in there) that you can't do a crocheted steek on
    superwash as the fibers are too slippery.  I also found comments there
    and elsewhere from Norwegians and friends-of-Norwegians who said they'd
    done machine-sewed steeks for years with never a problem with loose
    stitches or stiffness — so I thought, right, well –! and just went
    for it, following for the most part some advice from KidsKnits on steeking.

    So here are a few things that I learned:

    Join all new colors/balls in the middle of the front opening steek. 
    Do not be tempted to join anywhere else in order to save that arm's
    length of wool.  If all of the ends are in the front, they will be
    trimmed away like magic when you cut the steek, and you will not have
    to weave in all of those fiddly ends.  And I'm embarrassed to say that
    I didn't think of this much earlier!

    The Vest for a Fiancé steeks are far too big, especially the one at the neck.  They vary widely in width; I've no idea why.  I
    wanted the cut edges to be hidden under the folded hem, so had to
    re-reinforce the wider ones with the sewing machine and trim them again.  Yeah, I should
    have thought of that first, too, because I thought "this is huge" even as I was
    working it — 25 sts for the neck steek compared to 7 for the front opening and 11 for the
    armholes.  I did actually stitch two cutting lines, and cut the neck steek much closer to where I wanted it, but
    overestimated the first time around.  (The wool I "saved" by not
    joining new balls in the front, I lost by having to cut away a 2×4"/5x10cm  piece
    at the neck.)  Seven sts would probably be fine for each of the steeks —
    although I will say that I don't yet have that much experience with them, so am happy to hear other advice.  It looked as though
    Elizabeth Zimmermann's "kangaroo pouch" trick would have worked perfectly here.

    I tried not to have any floats longer than three stitches.  This was a real bother, but I think it paid off —

    Vest_fiance_6

    Vest_fiance_7 

    I'm actually rather pleased with the facings.  I had seen somewhere — stupidly, either forgot to bookmark it or didn't put it in the right call number in my internet bookmarks (yes, my bookmarks are cataloged in Dewey Decimal order) — that the traditional method of sewing down the facing is with an X-stitching on the inside, but upon sitting at the kitchen table with a blunt darning needle in very bright light, couldn't quite see how to do this without it showing on the right side.  The bottom hem facing had gone on surprisingly easily (I think I've only ever knitted them in before this!), with a kind of whipped stitch.  Since the cast-off edge of the front band had the "chain" running neatly along the edge, I took advantage of that and made sure that my hand-stitches went into the middle of each "link" and thus are completely invisible.  A neat trick — I'm sure I'm not the first one to have thought of this, either.

    These photos, I must say, show the wonders of blocking.  I was a bit dismayed with the gauche charm of the thing, still delighted with the colors and the patterns but just not quite sure that it was all going to come together, as it were — and yet after it was all stitched up and the ends snipped off or sewn in or tucked away, everything just sort of settled down most amazingly.

    The machine-sewn steeks, I must say, are quite flexible, not stiff in the least.

    Vest_fiance_9

    Actually, now that a week or so has passed, I'm beginning to forget the annoyances, and just remember the fun of it.  It's not a particularly flattering shape — the shoulders especially — but I love the colors, I still love the flowers on the front and the "stars" on the back, and the smart border between the two, and the dashes of white at the hem….


  • You Are a Cirrus Cloud


    You're a bit mysterious and reserved. You mostly keep to yourself and do your own thing.
    Some people may even consider you allusive. You're hard to track down at times.

    People who know you find you to be very transparent. It's always easy to tell what you're thinking about.
    You tend to drift more than most people. You're always trying out new ideas, friends, and even personalities.

    Well, people who know me have said that I am anything but transparent, although I can certainly be allusive.

  • Happythanksgiving

    From Laura (aged 9 11/12).